<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The NYT Syndicates Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2008/12/04/the-nyt-syndicates-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2008/12/04/the-nyt-syndicates-blogs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 05:00:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerrit Eicker</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2008/12/04/the-nyt-syndicates-blogs/#comment-1144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerrit Eicker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wirsprechenonline.wordpress.com/?p=3340#comment-1144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-nyt-and-wsj-launch-home-page-experiments/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pC&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;What the NYT is doing with Times Extra is simply expanding the newspaper site&#039;s existing aggregation feature which is handled by Blogrunner, out of its pen within the site&#039;s Technology section. &lt;strong&gt;Nevertheless, it&#039;s a big step for the NYT and represents the evolution of its approach to content.&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-nyt-and-wsj-launch-home-page-experiments/" rel="nofollow">pC</a>: &#8220;What the NYT is doing with Times Extra is simply expanding the newspaper site&#8217;s existing aggregation feature which is handled by Blogrunner, out of its pen within the site&#8217;s Technology section. <strong>Nevertheless, it&#8217;s a big step for the NYT and represents the evolution of its approach to content.</strong>&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerrit Eicker</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2008/12/04/the-nyt-syndicates-blogs/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerrit Eicker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wirsprechenonline.wordpress.com/?p=3340#comment-1139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/04/the-new-york-times-clutters-up-its-homepage-with-links-from-elsewhere-in-beta/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Schonfeld&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;That clutters the page, and leaves less room for other headlines.&lt;/strong&gt; I want that page to maximize the number of different stories I can explore about different subjects, not different points of view on the same subject. - &lt;strong&gt;When I want to see what the buzz is and all the different points of view about the most important stories, I go to Techmeme or Digg.&lt;/strong&gt; ... The New York Times wants to have it both ways by jamming its news filter beneath its own stories and making readers squint to figure out which is which.&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/times_extra_the_new_york_times.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;RWW&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;This is a step in the right direction. A small step, but a good step nonetheless.&lt;/strong&gt; Hopefully, the next move to be open will involve NYT sharing the metrics about how many users opt to use Times Extra and - given the options - where they choose to go for their news.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/04/the-new-york-times-clutters-up-its-homepage-with-links-from-elsewhere-in-beta/" rel="nofollow">Schonfeld</a>: &#8220;<strong>That clutters the page, and leaves less room for other headlines.</strong> I want that page to maximize the number of different stories I can explore about different subjects, not different points of view on the same subject. &#8211; <strong>When I want to see what the buzz is and all the different points of view about the most important stories, I go to Techmeme or Digg.</strong> &#8230; The New York Times wants to have it both ways by jamming its news filter beneath its own stories and making readers squint to figure out which is which.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/times_extra_the_new_york_times.php" rel="nofollow">RWW</a>: &#8220;<strong>This is a step in the right direction. A small step, but a good step nonetheless.</strong> Hopefully, the next move to be open will involve NYT sharing the metrics about how many users opt to use Times Extra and &#8211; given the options &#8211; where they choose to go for their news.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

