<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phishing for Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/01/06/phishing-for-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/01/06/phishing-for-twitter/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 05:00:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerrit Eicker</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/01/06/phishing-for-twitter/#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerrit Eicker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=3755#comment-1243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.clickz.com/090105-140319.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ClickZ&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://wir-sprechen-online.com/tag/twitter/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt; the hacked accounts were unrelated to a phishing attack that happened over the weekend.&lt;strong&gt; That incident was a straightforward scam that used e-mails presenting themselves as Twitter direct messages to get users to divulge password information.&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/twitter_security_collapses_oba.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;RWW&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;This can&#039;t be good for Twitter. It will be good for the people calling for more secure, standards based authentication on Twitter and elsewhere around the web. ... &lt;strong&gt;What major brand will be excited to sign up for the service now? Who would pay, even, to be put at such risk?&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.clickz.com/090105-140319.html" rel="nofollow">ClickZ</a>: &#8220;According to <a href="http://wir-sprechen-online.com/tag/twitter/" rel="nofollow">Twitter</a> the hacked accounts were unrelated to a phishing attack that happened over the weekend.<strong> That incident was a straightforward scam that used e-mails presenting themselves as Twitter direct messages to get users to divulge password information.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/twitter_security_collapses_oba.php" rel="nofollow">RWW</a>: &#8220;This can&#8217;t be good for Twitter. It will be good for the people calling for more secure, standards based authentication on Twitter and elsewhere around the web. &#8230; <strong>What major brand will be excited to sign up for the service now? Who would pay, even, to be put at such risk?</strong>&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

