<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg Changes DiggBar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/04/16/digg-changes-diggbar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/04/16/digg-changes-diggbar/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 05:00:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerrit Eicker</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/04/16/digg-changes-diggbar/#comment-2209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerrit Eicker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=5291#comment-2209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/despite-huge-activity-digg-offers-a-compromise-on-diggbar/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TC&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;With the DiggBar now doing 301 redirects for non logged-in users, Quinn says that the Digg-shortened URLs will not appear in the major search engines.&lt;/strong&gt; ... We&#039;ll be interested to hear what Danny Sullivan and other SEO experts have to say about these latest changes. Early reactions from others who were opposed seem pretty favorable.&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://searchengineland.com/the-diggbar-compromise-17576&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sullivan&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;I have mixed feelings. Showing a frame to only logged-in users seems like a fair compromise.&lt;/strong&gt; There’s no doubt that for some Digg users, the framebar is useful. It’s also easier for them to use than downloading a separate toolbar (though Kevin said Digg still plans to improve and promote its toolbar).&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://mashable.com/2009/04/15/diggbar-update/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mashable&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Considering that publishers who despise the DiggBar have already developed ways to block it, Digg might be moving too swiftly to answer a few critics at the cost of users who could actually benefit from the product.&lt;/strong&gt; Not to mention, it’ll be a blow to the considerable activity increases that Digg was seeing thanks to DiggBar. - As a matter of disclosure, a side project of mine (BurnURL (BurnURL reviews)) does some similar things to DiggBar and has been the subject of similar criticism. &quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_reacts_to_critics_changes_the_way_the_diggbar_works.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;RWW&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Digg also announced that an astonishing 45% of all the activity on Digg is now happening on the DiggBar&lt;/strong&gt;, and 25% of all DiggBar users are using the toolbar to discover new content by looking at related stories. According to John Quinn, only a very small number of Digg users have disabled the toolbar.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/15/despite-huge-activity-digg-offers-a-compromise-on-diggbar/" rel="nofollow">TC</a>: &#8220;<strong>With the DiggBar now doing 301 redirects for non logged-in users, Quinn says that the Digg-shortened URLs will not appear in the major search engines.</strong> &#8230; We&#8217;ll be interested to hear what Danny Sullivan and other SEO experts have to say about these latest changes. Early reactions from others who were opposed seem pretty favorable.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://searchengineland.com/the-diggbar-compromise-17576" rel="nofollow">Sullivan</a>: &#8220;<strong>I have mixed feelings. Showing a frame to only logged-in users seems like a fair compromise.</strong> There’s no doubt that for some Digg users, the framebar is useful. It’s also easier for them to use than downloading a separate toolbar (though Kevin said Digg still plans to improve and promote its toolbar).&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://mashable.com/2009/04/15/diggbar-update/" rel="nofollow">Mashable</a>: &#8220;<strong>Considering that publishers who despise the DiggBar have already developed ways to block it, Digg might be moving too swiftly to answer a few critics at the cost of users who could actually benefit from the product.</strong> Not to mention, it’ll be a blow to the considerable activity increases that Digg was seeing thanks to DiggBar. &#8211; As a matter of disclosure, a side project of mine (BurnURL (BurnURL reviews)) does some similar things to DiggBar and has been the subject of similar criticism. &#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/digg_reacts_to_critics_changes_the_way_the_diggbar_works.php" rel="nofollow">RWW</a>: &#8220;<strong>Digg also announced that an astonishing 45% of all the activity on Digg is now happening on the DiggBar</strong>, and 25% of all DiggBar users are using the toolbar to discover new content by looking at related stories. According to John Quinn, only a very small number of Digg users have disabled the toolbar.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

