<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wolfram&#124;Alpha: Google + Wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/05/16/wolframalpha-google-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/05/16/wolframalpha-google-wikipedia/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:00:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerrit Eicker</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/05/16/wolframalpha-google-wikipedia/#comment-2654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerrit Eicker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 06:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=5824#comment-2654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wolframalpha.com/2009/05/15/live-from-champaign/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wolfram&#124;Alpha&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;just went live for the very first time, running all clusters.&lt;/strong&gt; - This first run at testing Wolfram&#124;Alpha in the real world is off to an auspicious start, although not surprisingly, we’re still working on some kinks, especially around logging. - While we’re still in the early stages of this long-term project, it is really gratifying to finally have the opportunity to invite you to participate in this project with us.&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://mashable.com/2009/05/15/wolfram-alpha-launch-2/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mashable&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;It&#039;s interesting, too, that Wolfram Alpha attempted to deflect the hype (and likely disappointment) early on by asserting that it was not a Google competitor, but then &lt;strong&gt;ramped up the hype once again by live-streaming the incredibly challenging launch process&lt;/strong&gt;.&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/putting-wolfram-alpha-to-the-test-not-super-impressed-but-here-are-50-invites/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TC&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Finally, it is not as though Web isn&#039;t evolving as well.&lt;/strong&gt; Wolfram needs to store all of the data it sifts through in its own databases because that is how it imposes structure on the data. &lt;strong&gt;The Web is messy and unstructured.&lt;/strong&gt; Yet there is a general movement afoot to impose structure on the data found across the Web. &lt;strong&gt;Everyone from semantic search startups to Google itself is making the Web more computable by categorizing the information on it in a way that computers can understand and manipulate more easily.&lt;/strong&gt; Of course, to the extent that happens, Wolfram Alpha can take advantage of it as well. - &lt;strong&gt;In search, whoever can come up with the best answer wins. As promising as it is, that isn&#039;t Wolfram Alpha yet.&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://blog.wolframalpha.com/2009/05/15/live-from-champaign/" rel="nofollow">Wolfram|Alpha</a>: &#8220;just went live for the very first time, running all clusters.</strong> &#8211; This first run at testing Wolfram|Alpha in the real world is off to an auspicious start, although not surprisingly, we’re still working on some kinks, especially around logging. &#8211; While we’re still in the early stages of this long-term project, it is really gratifying to finally have the opportunity to invite you to participate in this project with us.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://mashable.com/2009/05/15/wolfram-alpha-launch-2/" rel="nofollow">Mashable</a>: &#8220;It&#8217;s interesting, too, that Wolfram Alpha attempted to deflect the hype (and likely disappointment) early on by asserting that it was not a Google competitor, but then <strong>ramped up the hype once again by live-streaming the incredibly challenging launch process</strong>.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/15/putting-wolfram-alpha-to-the-test-not-super-impressed-but-here-are-50-invites/" rel="nofollow">TC</a>: &#8220;<strong>Finally, it is not as though Web isn&#8217;t evolving as well.</strong> Wolfram needs to store all of the data it sifts through in its own databases because that is how it imposes structure on the data. <strong>The Web is messy and unstructured.</strong> Yet there is a general movement afoot to impose structure on the data found across the Web. <strong>Everyone from semantic search startups to Google itself is making the Web more computable by categorizing the information on it in a way that computers can understand and manipulate more easily.</strong> Of course, to the extent that happens, Wolfram Alpha can take advantage of it as well. &#8211; <strong>In search, whoever can come up with the best answer wins. As promising as it is, that isn&#8217;t Wolfram Alpha yet.</strong>&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

