<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Goes Everyone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/06/25/facebook-goes-everyone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/06/25/facebook-goes-everyone/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:44:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Privacy &#171; Wir sprechen Online.</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/06/25/facebook-goes-everyone/#comment-4563</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook Privacy &#171; Wir sprechen Online.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=6538#comment-4563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Facebook sees its new control panel as an opportunity to invite users to shrug off their privacy; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Facebook sees its new control panel as an opportunity to invite users to shrug off their privacy; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Privacy II. &#171; Wir sprechen Online.</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/06/25/facebook-goes-everyone/#comment-4560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook Privacy II. &#171; Wir sprechen Online.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=6538#comment-4560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Privacy&#160;II. Again! A Facebook privacy update forces users to readjust settings unless everyone shall have access; http://j.mp/617tEl  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Privacy&nbsp;II. Again! A Facebook privacy update forces users to readjust settings unless everyone shall have access; <a href="http://j.mp/617tEl" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/617tEl</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook vs. Twitter III. &#171; Wir sprechen Online.</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/06/25/facebook-goes-everyone/#comment-3477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook vs. Twitter III. &#171; Wir sprechen Online.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=6538#comment-3477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Nethnology (273), Quotes (298), Twitter (264), Web (1,458)    Keath: No matter how many features they share, it is unlikely that Facebook makes Twitter unnecessary; http://j.mp/1Ihw4   [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nethnology (273), Quotes (298), Twitter (264), Web (1,458)    Keath: No matter how many features they share, it is unlikely that Facebook makes Twitter unnecessary; <a href="http://j.mp/1Ihw4" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/1Ihw4</a>   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Outnumbers Twitter in Growth &#171; Wir sprechen Online.</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/06/25/facebook-goes-everyone/#comment-3290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook Outnumbers Twitter in Growth &#171; Wir sprechen Online.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=6538#comment-3290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Stats (54), Twitter (244), Web (1,349)    comScore: Facebook grew twice as fast as Twitter in July. Everyone lets time spend online explode; http://bit.ly/4AYkOv   [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stats (54), Twitter (244), Web (1,349)    comScore: Facebook grew twice as fast as Twitter in July. Everyone lets time spend online explode; <a href="http://bit.ly/4AYkOv" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/4AYkOv</a>   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerrit Eicker</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/06/25/facebook-goes-everyone/#comment-2938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerrit Eicker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=6538#comment-2938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=98499677130&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Today, we&#039;re launching a beta version of an improved &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/help.php?page=879&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Publisher&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; - the main place to add content such as photos, videos, and status updates on your home page and profile. The new Publisher has been streamlined a bit, and its most significant improvement is the new Publisher Privacy Control that gives you the opportunity to answer the question, &#039;Who do you want to tell?&#039; as easily as you answer the question, &#039;What&#039;s on your mind?&#039; ... &lt;strong&gt;Everyone: Anyone, on or off, of Facebook can see it.&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/24/facebook-brings-privacy-controls-to-publisher/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TC&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Don’t be fooled&lt;/strong&gt; by what appears to be a minor change in the user interface. &lt;strong&gt;This is another indication of Facebook’s extreme desire to get users to make as much of their data public as possible. Just like Twitter.&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_day_facebook_changed_messages_to_become_pulic.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;RWW&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;The Day Facebook Changed Forever: Messages to Become Public By Default (UPDATED)&lt;/strong&gt; ... After we wrote this post, &lt;strong&gt;Facebook HQ emailed to tell us that the first wave of users who get this feature will have their messages made public by default because their profiles were already marked as public&lt;/strong&gt;, but that when they open the feature up to subsequent users - those users will have default privacy settings that match their pre-existing profile privacy settings. Unfortunately, in our tests so far (see our &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.screencast.com/users/jolieodell/folders/Jing/media/b396e7cf-e76a-4d99-828d-25333143b318&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;screencast&lt;/a&gt;) - we haven&#039;t been able to successfully change our default message settings back to friends-only, it stays stuck on public. When we switch our test account from profile public to profile private and then back again, the default for message posting gets stuck at &#039;friends of friends!&#039; ... &lt;strong&gt;In time, though, people may very well decide they are comfortable with their social networking being public by default. That will be a different world, and today will have been one of the most important days in that new world&#039;s unfolding.&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=98499677130" rel="nofollow">Facebook</a>: &#8220;<strong>Today, we&#8217;re launching a beta version of an improved <a href="http://www.facebook.com/help.php?page=879" rel="nofollow">Publisher</a></strong> &#8211; the main place to add content such as photos, videos, and status updates on your home page and profile. The new Publisher has been streamlined a bit, and its most significant improvement is the new Publisher Privacy Control that gives you the opportunity to answer the question, &#8216;Who do you want to tell?&#8217; as easily as you answer the question, &#8216;What&#8217;s on your mind?&#8217; &#8230; <strong>Everyone: Anyone, on or off, of Facebook can see it.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/24/facebook-brings-privacy-controls-to-publisher/" rel="nofollow">TC</a>: &#8220;<strong>Don’t be fooled</strong> by what appears to be a minor change in the user interface. <strong>This is another indication of Facebook’s extreme desire to get users to make as much of their data public as possible. Just like Twitter.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_day_facebook_changed_messages_to_become_pulic.php" rel="nofollow">RWW</a>: &#8220;<strong>The Day Facebook Changed Forever: Messages to Become Public By Default (UPDATED)</strong> &#8230; After we wrote this post, <strong>Facebook HQ emailed to tell us that the first wave of users who get this feature will have their messages made public by default because their profiles were already marked as public</strong>, but that when they open the feature up to subsequent users &#8211; those users will have default privacy settings that match their pre-existing profile privacy settings. Unfortunately, in our tests so far (see our <a href="http://www.screencast.com/users/jolieodell/folders/Jing/media/b396e7cf-e76a-4d99-828d-25333143b318" rel="nofollow">screencast</a>) &#8211; we haven&#8217;t been able to successfully change our default message settings back to friends-only, it stays stuck on public. When we switch our test account from profile public to profile private and then back again, the default for message posting gets stuck at &#8216;friends of friends!&#8217; &#8230; <strong>In time, though, people may very well decide they are comfortable with their social networking being public by default. That will be a different world, and today will have been one of the most important days in that new world&#8217;s unfolding.</strong>&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

