<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/07/02/facebook-privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/07/02/facebook-privacy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:00:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Privacy VIII. « Wir sprechen Online.</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/07/02/facebook-privacy/#comment-28563</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook Privacy VIII. « Wir sprechen Online.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=6637#comment-28563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Facebook: You need to explicitly choose to share [address, mobile number] before [3rd parties] can access; http://eicker.at/24 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Facebook: You need to explicitly choose to share [address, mobile number] before [3rd parties] can access; <a href="http://eicker.at/24" rel="nofollow">http://eicker.at/24</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Privacy VII. &#171; Wir sprechen Online.</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/07/02/facebook-privacy/#comment-20730</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook Privacy VII. &#171; Wir sprechen Online.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=6637#comment-20730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Privacy&#160;VII. Solis: The idea of privacy and publicity are at odds. Facebook and the new age of privacy; http://j.mp/bzi0ug  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Privacy&nbsp;VII. Solis: The idea of privacy and publicity are at odds. Facebook and the new age of privacy; <a href="http://j.mp/bzi0ug" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/bzi0ug</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReclaimPrivacy &#171; Wir sprechen Online.</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/07/02/facebook-privacy/#comment-10866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ReclaimPrivacy &#171; Wir sprechen Online.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 12:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=6637#comment-10866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Scan your Facebook privacy settings via ReclaimPrivacy, an independent and open tool; http://j.mp/9EvyEB  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scan your Facebook privacy settings via ReclaimPrivacy, an independent and open tool; <a href="http://j.mp/9EvyEB" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/9EvyEB</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Privacy IV. &#171; Wir sprechen Online.</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/07/02/facebook-privacy/#comment-10303</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook Privacy IV. &#171; Wir sprechen Online.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 12:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=6637#comment-10303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Privacy&#160;IV. Inside Facebook analysis: some Facebook privacy issues are real, some are not; http://j.mp/b4Z0Ch  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Privacy&nbsp;IV. Inside Facebook analysis: some Facebook privacy issues are real, some are not; <a href="http://j.mp/b4Z0Ch" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/b4Z0Ch</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Privacy III. &#171; Wir sprechen Online.</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/07/02/facebook-privacy/#comment-10288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook Privacy III. &#171; Wir sprechen Online.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 07:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=6637#comment-10288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Privacy&#160;III. Daitch: Facebook can not be trusted. Orwellian takeover of a single platform is a dystopian future; http://j.mp/b9EFBm  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Privacy&nbsp;III. Daitch: Facebook can not be trusted. Orwellian takeover of a single platform is a dystopian future; <a href="http://j.mp/b9EFBm" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/b9EFBm</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Age of Privacy has Just Started &#171; Wir sprechen Online.</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/07/02/facebook-privacy/#comment-5000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Age of Privacy has Just Started &#171; Wir sprechen Online.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=6637#comment-5000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Age of Privacy has Just&#160;Started Zuckerberg, Facebook, believes that privacy is over: Hopefully the age of privacy has just started; http://j.mp/8AHo6o  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Age of Privacy has Just&nbsp;Started Zuckerberg, Facebook, believes that privacy is over: Hopefully the age of privacy has just started; <a href="http://j.mp/8AHo6o" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/8AHo6o</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Epic vs. Facebook &#171; Wir sprechen Online.</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/07/02/facebook-privacy/#comment-4743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Epic vs. Facebook &#171; Wir sprechen Online.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=6637#comment-4743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] vs.&#160;Facebook Epic files a complaint on Facebook privacy changes with the FTC: unfair, deceptive trade practices; http://j.mp/8O7RpS  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vs.&nbsp;Facebook Epic files a complaint on Facebook privacy changes with the FTC: unfair, deceptive trade practices; <a href="http://j.mp/8O7RpS" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/8O7RpS</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Privacy II. &#171; Wir sprechen Online.</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/07/02/facebook-privacy/#comment-4559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Facebook Privacy II. &#171; Wir sprechen Online.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=6637#comment-4559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Privacy&#160;II. Again! A Facebook privacy update forces users to readjust settings unless everyone shall have access; http://j.mp/617tEl  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Privacy&nbsp;II. Again! A Facebook privacy update forces users to readjust settings unless everyone shall have access; <a href="http://j.mp/617tEl" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/617tEl</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerrit Eicker</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/07/02/facebook-privacy/#comment-2976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerrit Eicker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=6637#comment-2976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/01/the-looming-facebook-privacy-fiasco/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TC&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;In any case, Facebook is going to achieve its biggest goals with these updates: people will soon be sharing far more with the web than they were previously, and the social network will be able to mount a substantial challenge against Twitter.&lt;/strong&gt; Of course, this isn&#039;t the way Facebook is positioning the changes. One of my favorite parts of the conference call was when &lt;strong&gt;ReadWriteWeb&#039;s Marshall Kirkpatrick noted that Facebook was clearly looking to encourage users to open up their data to the public and asked for the social network’s motivations. Facebook&#039;s response? It wants people to make their data public because it helps disambiguate users with similar names.&lt;/strong&gt; My phone was muted at the time, but I was laughing heartily.&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebooks_new_privacy_policies_live_blogging_the_p.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;RWW&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Facebook&#039;s official privacy policy has long stated that you are in control of the information you chose to share. What does that mean, though?&lt;/strong&gt; Until last week all users really only had two big choices about the visibility of their content: it was either public to everyone or visible to all their friends. Visibility to networks, like your school or city, was one of many complicating factors in a situation that confused most people. &lt;strong&gt;Saying that users have control over their information on Facebook has seemed like a stretch. It is very important to many Facebook users that at the very least, people not be given access to their information without approval.&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/07/01/facebook-announcing-privacy-changes/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;VB&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;The big picture here is that Facebook wants people to feel secure knowing who they’re sharing with, so they’ll share as much information as possible.&lt;/strong&gt; The more data that Facebook has about who is sharing what, the more it can target ads to those people as well as have more places to serve ads.&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_wants_you_to_be_less_private_-_but_why.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;RWW&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Making Facebook like &lt;a href=&quot;http://wir-sprechen-online.com/tag/twitter/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt; doesn&#039;t sound like the best idea in the world, but it&#039;s just about the only credible explanation we can think of for the increasingly clear push towards more public sharing on the site.&lt;/strong&gt; Privacy settings have been confusing and today&#039;s move to simplify them is great. But Facebook is a small-group method of communication for the vast majority of its users and emphasizing list-specific messaging instead of &#039;everyone&#039; would be a more honest way to give users more control over their privacy.&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/02/business/02facebook.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NYT&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;When asked if Facebook was trying to keep up with Twitter, Brandee Barker, Facebook&#039;s director of communications, said the new settings were about encouraging more connections between people. &#039;Sharing has always been at the core of our product,&#039; she said. &#039;&lt;strong&gt;By recommending more open defaults, more people will be able to connect on the site.&lt;/strong&gt;&#039;&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/01/facebook-will-give-users-more-control-over-who-sees-what/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NYT&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;For the moment, the features are only available to 40,000 Facebook members in the United States.&lt;/strong&gt; Next week, the test pool will expand to 80,000. Once the service is out of beta, the various settings will be accessible from a drop-down menu next to the status update and photo upload boxes.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/01/the-looming-facebook-privacy-fiasco/" rel="nofollow">TC</a>: &#8220;<strong>In any case, Facebook is going to achieve its biggest goals with these updates: people will soon be sharing far more with the web than they were previously, and the social network will be able to mount a substantial challenge against Twitter.</strong> Of course, this isn&#8217;t the way Facebook is positioning the changes. One of my favorite parts of the conference call was when <strong>ReadWriteWeb&#8217;s Marshall Kirkpatrick noted that Facebook was clearly looking to encourage users to open up their data to the public and asked for the social network’s motivations. Facebook&#8217;s response? It wants people to make their data public because it helps disambiguate users with similar names.</strong> My phone was muted at the time, but I was laughing heartily.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebooks_new_privacy_policies_live_blogging_the_p.php" rel="nofollow">RWW</a>: &#8220;<strong>Facebook&#8217;s official privacy policy has long stated that you are in control of the information you chose to share. What does that mean, though?</strong> Until last week all users really only had two big choices about the visibility of their content: it was either public to everyone or visible to all their friends. Visibility to networks, like your school or city, was one of many complicating factors in a situation that confused most people. <strong>Saying that users have control over their information on Facebook has seemed like a stretch. It is very important to many Facebook users that at the very least, people not be given access to their information without approval.</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://digital.venturebeat.com/2009/07/01/facebook-announcing-privacy-changes/" rel="nofollow">VB</a>: &#8220;<strong>The big picture here is that Facebook wants people to feel secure knowing who they’re sharing with, so they’ll share as much information as possible.</strong> The more data that Facebook has about who is sharing what, the more it can target ads to those people as well as have more places to serve ads.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_wants_you_to_be_less_private_-_but_why.php" rel="nofollow">RWW</a>: &#8220;<strong>Making Facebook like <a href="http://wir-sprechen-online.com/tag/twitter/" rel="nofollow">Twitter</a> doesn&#8217;t sound like the best idea in the world, but it&#8217;s just about the only credible explanation we can think of for the increasingly clear push towards more public sharing on the site.</strong> Privacy settings have been confusing and today&#8217;s move to simplify them is great. But Facebook is a small-group method of communication for the vast majority of its users and emphasizing list-specific messaging instead of &#8216;everyone&#8217; would be a more honest way to give users more control over their privacy.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/02/business/02facebook.html" rel="nofollow">NYT</a>: &#8220;When asked if Facebook was trying to keep up with Twitter, Brandee Barker, Facebook&#8217;s director of communications, said the new settings were about encouraging more connections between people. &#8216;Sharing has always been at the core of our product,&#8217; she said. &#8216;<strong>By recommending more open defaults, more people will be able to connect on the site.</strong>&#8216;&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/01/facebook-will-give-users-more-control-over-who-sees-what/" rel="nofollow">NYT</a>: &#8220;<strong>For the moment, the features are only available to 40,000 Facebook members in the United States.</strong> Next week, the test pool will expand to 80,000. Once the service is out of beta, the various settings will be accessible from a drop-down menu next to the status update and photo upload boxes.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

