<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FCC Takes on Apple, AT&amp;T</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/08/01/fcc-takes-on-apple-att/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/08/01/fcc-takes-on-apple-att/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:44:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google vs. Apple &#171; Wir sprechen Online.</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/08/01/fcc-takes-on-apple-att/#comment-3508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Google vs. Apple &#171; Wir sprechen Online.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 08:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=7042#comment-3508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Mobile (80), Net (1,113), USA (27), Web (1,485)    Either Google or Apple is flat out lying to the FCC as to the rejection of Google Voice for iPhone; http://j.mp/1BpBXZ   [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mobile (80), Net (1,113), USA (27), Web (1,485)    Either Google or Apple is flat out lying to the FCC as to the rejection of Google Voice for iPhone; <a href="http://j.mp/1BpBXZ" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/1BpBXZ</a>   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerrit Eicker</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/08/01/fcc-takes-on-apple-att/#comment-3221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerrit Eicker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 16:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=7042#comment-3221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/01/why-the-fcc-wants-to-smash-open-the-iphone/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TC&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Right about now, Apple probably wishes it had never rejected Google Voice and related apps from the iPhone. Or maybe it was AT&amp;T who rejected the apps. Nobody really knows.&lt;/strong&gt; But the FCC launched an investigation last night to find out, sending letters to all three companies (Apple, AT&amp;T, and Google) asking them to explain exactly what happened. ... Hopefully, the FCC will share Apple&#039;s answers with the rest of the us. It is all a bit absurd, though. Why does it take a formal request from a government agency to get Apple (and AT&amp;T) to explain what the rules are to get on the wireless Internet? More importantly, why are these companies allowed to be the gatekeepers to the wireless Internet? &lt;strong&gt;The iPhone needs to be smashed open, and the FCC is swinging the hammer.&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/01/why-the-fcc-wants-to-smash-open-the-iphone/" rel="nofollow">TC</a>: &#8220;<strong>Right about now, Apple probably wishes it had never rejected Google Voice and related apps from the iPhone. Or maybe it was AT&amp;T who rejected the apps. Nobody really knows.</strong> But the FCC launched an investigation last night to find out, sending letters to all three companies (Apple, AT&amp;T, and Google) asking them to explain exactly what happened. &#8230; Hopefully, the FCC will share Apple&#8217;s answers with the rest of the us. It is all a bit absurd, though. Why does it take a formal request from a government agency to get Apple (and AT&amp;T) to explain what the rules are to get on the wireless Internet? More importantly, why are these companies allowed to be the gatekeepers to the wireless Internet? <strong>The iPhone needs to be smashed open, and the FCC is swinging the hammer.</strong>&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

