<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schmidt vs. Murdoch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/12/03/schmidt-vs-murdoch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/12/03/schmidt-vs-murdoch/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 05:00:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paid Content: Rusbridger vs. Murdoch &#171; Wir sprechen Online.</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/12/03/schmidt-vs-murdoch/#comment-5382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paid Content: Rusbridger vs. Murdoch &#171; Wir sprechen Online.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=9405#comment-5382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Content: Rusbridger vs.&#160;Murdoch Murdoch: pay walls for all newspaper Web sites this year vs. Rusbridger: bad idea for journalism; http://j.mp/9naeEY  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Content: Rusbridger vs.&nbsp;Murdoch Murdoch: pay walls for all newspaper Web sites this year vs. Rusbridger: bad idea for journalism; <a href="http://j.mp/9naeEY" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/9naeEY</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paywalls &#171; Wir sprechen Online.</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/12/03/schmidt-vs-murdoch/#comment-4822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paywalls &#171; Wir sprechen Online.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 07:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=9405#comment-4822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Media, news in particular, goes paywalls in 2010: media businesses need to try something new; http://j.mp/paywalls  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Media, news in particular, goes paywalls in 2010: media businesses need to try something new; <a href="http://j.mp/paywalls" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/paywalls</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerrit Eicker</title>
		<link>http://wir-sprechen-online.com/2009/12/03/schmidt-vs-murdoch/#comment-4355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerrit Eicker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wir-sprechen-online.com/?p=9405#comment-4355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107104574569570797550520.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Schmidt&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;With dwindling revenue and diminished resources, frustrated newspaper executives are looking for someone to blame.&lt;/strong&gt; Much of their anger is currently directed at Google, whom many executives view as getting all the benefit from the business relationship without giving much in return. &lt;strong&gt;The facts, I believe, suggest otherwise. - Google is a great source of promotion.&lt;/strong&gt; We send online news publishers a billion clicks a month from Google News and more than three billion extra visits from our other services, such as Web Search and iGoogle. &lt;strong&gt;That is 100,000 opportunities a minute to win loyal readers and generate revenue - for free.&lt;/strong&gt; In terms of copyright, another bone of contention, we only show a headline and a couple of lines from each story. If readers want to read on they have to click through to the newspaper&#039;s Web site. (The exception are stories we host through a licensing agreement with news services.) And if they wish, publishers can remove their content from our search index, or from Google News. - &lt;strong&gt;I certainly don&#039;t believe that the Internet will mean the death of news.&lt;/strong&gt; Through innovation and technology, it can endure with newfound profitability and vitality. Video didn&#039;t kill the radio star. It created a whole new additional industry.&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/03/google-newspaper-industry-dont-shoot-gift-horse/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TC&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Not even Google can save much of the dying print newspaper business, but it can help them build up their digital revenues.&lt;/strong&gt; And that&#039;s the subtext of Google&#039;s message to newspaper publishers: &lt;strong&gt;Don&#039;t shoot the gift horse that feeds you.&lt;/strong&gt; (To mangle three well-worn phrases together). Those 4 billion clicks a month are a gift. While they might not add up to expense-account lunches all around at Per Se, they are nourishment nonetheless.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107104574569570797550520.html" rel="nofollow">Schmidt</a>: &#8220;<strong>With dwindling revenue and diminished resources, frustrated newspaper executives are looking for someone to blame.</strong> Much of their anger is currently directed at Google, whom many executives view as getting all the benefit from the business relationship without giving much in return. <strong>The facts, I believe, suggest otherwise. &#8211; Google is a great source of promotion.</strong> We send online news publishers a billion clicks a month from Google News and more than three billion extra visits from our other services, such as Web Search and iGoogle. <strong>That is 100,000 opportunities a minute to win loyal readers and generate revenue &#8211; for free.</strong> In terms of copyright, another bone of contention, we only show a headline and a couple of lines from each story. If readers want to read on they have to click through to the newspaper&#8217;s Web site. (The exception are stories we host through a licensing agreement with news services.) And if they wish, publishers can remove their content from our search index, or from Google News. &#8211; <strong>I certainly don&#8217;t believe that the Internet will mean the death of news.</strong> Through innovation and technology, it can endure with newfound profitability and vitality. Video didn&#8217;t kill the radio star. It created a whole new additional industry.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/03/google-newspaper-industry-dont-shoot-gift-horse/" rel="nofollow">TC</a>: &#8220;<strong>Not even Google can save much of the dying print newspaper business, but it can help them build up their digital revenues.</strong> And that&#8217;s the subtext of Google&#8217;s message to newspaper publishers: <strong>Don&#8217;t shoot the gift horse that feeds you.</strong> (To mangle three well-worn phrases together). Those 4 billion clicks a month are a gift. While they might not add up to expense-account lunches all around at Per Se, they are nourishment nonetheless.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

