Gmail Priority Inbox
Google: Priority Inbox for Gmail fights eMail overload by displaying emails in order of importance; http://j.mp/bLJVU1
Tagged: Google RSS
-
Gerrit Eicker
-
Gerrit Eicker
YouTube Going Pay-per-view?
RWW: YouTube negotiates with major movie studios that could launch a pay-per-view video service; http://j.mp/cZqYq4
-
Gerrit Eicker
Icons of the Web
A sea of favicons, presented proportional to the sum of reach of sites using it; http://j.mp/Webicons (via @VizWorld)
-
Gerrit Eicker
Management
WSJ: The end of management. Corporate bureaucracy is becoming obsolete; http://j.mp/c0ANnd (via @heinz)
Gerrit Eicker
Big Business in Virtualised Real Life
Keegan: Is real life heading to virtual worlds like Second Life, Blue Mars, Entropia? http://j.mp/cFGmvH (via @malburns)
Gerrit Eicker
Facebook Places: Marketing Opportunities
Facebook Places offers a bunch of marketing opportunities: Claim your place, next to your page; http://j.mp/9YwmZX
-
Gerrit Eicker
TC: “One incentive that Facebook is using to encourage businesses to create a Places page is advertising. Facebook says that ‘Once you claim your Place, you’ll be able to advertise it just as you advertise your Facebook Page. To advertise your Place, click ‘I want to advertise something I have on Facebook’ in the ad creation flow and choose your Place from the drop-down menu.’ Advertising is completely self serve and seems fairly simple. Currently, you cannot target people who check-in to your Place, but a business can target people who ‘Like’ your Place page if you have performed a Page to Place merge.”
SEL: “One of the questions that came up after the formal launch of Facebook Places last night was: how will this affect Google Places (among others)? As an aside, I have to say it’s really strange that these products have nearly the identical name. It’s almost like Honda offering a car with a particular name and then Toyota coming out with a car with the same model name. … However from a local business standpoint the two Places are conceptually if not practically quite similar. Local businesses can claim their Places pages on both sites and use them as promotional tools in several ways. I’m not going to enumerate the relative merits or practical aspects of this comparison here; I’ll leave that for another article or articles plural. … In fact, Facebook Places may actually help Google Places rather than harm it. By raising awareness of the need to ‘claim’ your listing generally Google Places may see an increase in local business activity on its pages. Claiming your listings at both Places will be on the list of must-do local online promotions for small businesses going forward.”
FC: “With Places, not only does Facebook get to add a potentially money-spinning stream of data to all Places players (namely, your location and location habits, which is data ripe for mining for marketing), but it also gets a new network – the location database of local businesses. Facebook had data in businesses before, but the fact that it’ll now be able to geolocate them means Facebook will likely build up plans for location-sensitive advertising, tied to which particular shop you’re in (imaging a competitors ad popping up when youre checked in, offering lower prices or a promotional discount). It lets Facebook potentially build up a powerful ‘points of interest’ database, should it every feel like leaping into the personal navigation or augmented reality games. It lets Facebook’s app developers come up with creative uses for the data that we haven’t even thought about yet.”
eMarketer: “Location will give Facebook a new way to target and sell advertising. Mobile hasn’t been a part of Facebook’s ad offerings until now, but that will change. By offering ways for marketers to target Facebook users not only on the online service but also when they are on the go and using Facebook on their mobile phones, it opens up all-new avenues for interaction. In particular, Places gives local businesses a great reason to advertise on Facebook. Many of them already have a Facebook Page; by creating a new Facebook Place (essentially a page where people can check in and see who else they know who has checked in), businesses can give customers ‘the power to tell their friends about your business,’ as the Places advertising FAQ says.”
Gerrit Eicker
Sign-ins Via Janrain Engage (RPX)
Janrain Engage (RPX) lets website visitors sign-in with social media accounts, publishes usage stats; http://j.mp/9SQ05E
-
Gerrit Eicker
Janrain: “How people prefer to sign-in to sites on the Web: 38% Google, 24% Facebook, 14% Yahoo, 5% Twitter, 5% Windows Live, 14% Other. … Overall relative popularity of each network has held steady during the past quarter. Google remains the most preferred network with nearly 40% share. Facebook continues to be a popular option, and Yahoo!’s share has grown slightly since April, with 14% preferring a Yahoo! account to sign-in. While Twitter’s popularity in the social web ecosystem continues to rise, it still remains the 4th most popular network for sign-in across our customers’ websites. … The story is different with media companies. On news media sites, Yahoo! is the leading choice for sign-in with 34% share. As a content-focused network, Yahoo! users proactively seek out news and timely content across the web, making it no surprise that the network performs well in this industry segment. Facebook and Google also maintain strong presences on news media sites. … For magazine publishers, Facebook comprises 57% share of all logins. Many magazine publishers focus on lifestyle and interests, a natural pairing with Facebook users who like to share their interests with friends. … A look across Europe shows that Facebook is the most popular network for sign-in, followed by Google and Twitter: 39% Facebook, 26% Google, 12% Twitter, 8% Windows Live, 7% Yahoo, 6% Hyves, 2% Other. … Preferred social networks for sharing: 53% Facebook, 37% Twitter, 8% Yahoo, 7% MySpace.“
Gerrit Eicker
Being Half-open?
Schonfeld on Google-Verizon: Wireless is not different. You can not be half-open; http://j.mp/bGw6Ib
Gerrit Eicker
The Internet, Our Thinking
Naughton: Is the internet changing the way we think? Affecting the way we think for the worse? http://j.mp/apBvu3
Gerrit Eicker
Deutschland und das Netz
Breuer: Deutschland und das Internet, das ist eine lange, komplizierte Beziehung; http://j.mp/a72wxw
Gerrit Eicker 09:14 on 27. August 2010 Permalink |
NMAP: “A large-scale scan of the top million web sites (per Alexa traffic data) was performed in early 2010 using the Nmap Security Scanner and its scripting engine. As seen in the New York Times, Slashdot, Gizmodo, Engadget, and Telegraph.co.uk … – We retrieved each site’s icon by first parsing the HTML for a link tag and then falling back to /favicon.ico if that failed. 328,427 unique icons were collected, of which 288,945 were proper images. The remaining 39,482 were error strings and other non-image files. Our original goal was just to improve our http-favicon.nse script, but we had enough fun browsing so many icons that we used them to create the visualization below. – The area of each icon is proportional to the sum of the reach of all sites using that icon. When both a bare domain name and its “www.” counterpart used the same icon, only one of them was counted. The smallest icons – those corresponding to sites with approximately 0.0001% reach – are scaled to 16×16 pixels. The largest icon (Google) is 11,936 x 11,936 pixels, and the whole diagram is 37,440 x 37,440 (1.4 gigapixels).“