Wolfram|Alpha
The Wolfram|Alpha will change the Web as much as Google and Wikipedia did; http://tr.im/kbZe – Video preview: http://tr.im/kbZl
Tagged: Wolfram Alpha RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts
Gerrit Eicker
Wolfram Alpha: a Preview
RWW previews WolframAlpha: “Maybe it is actually wrong to call (it) a search engine at all”; http://tr.im/jJ6D
Gerrit Eicker
Wolfram Alpha
http://WolframAlpha.com, the computational knowledge engine starting in May, might hurt Google; http://tr.im/heBG
-
Gerrit Eicker
Wolfram: “It’s going to be a website: wolframalpha.com. With one simple input field that gives access to a huge system, with trillions of pieces of curated data and millions of lines of algorithms.”
TC: “[Wolfram Alpha] doesn’t simply return documents that (might) contain the answers, like Google does, and it isn’t just a giant database of knowledge, like the Wikipedia. It doesn’t simply parse natural language and then use that to retrieve documents, like Powerset, for example. Instead, Wolfram Alpha actually computes the answers to a wide range of questions – like questions that have factual answers such as ‘What country is Timbuktu in?’ or ‘How many protons are in a hydrogen atom?’ or ‘What is the average rainfall in Seattle?’ – Think about that for a minute. It computes the answers. Wolfram Alpha doesn’t simply contain huge amounts of manually entered pairs of questions and answers, nor does it search for answers in a database of facts. Instead, it understands and then computes answers to certain kinds of questions. … Maybe Wolfram Alpha could even do a better job of retrieving documents than Google, for certain kinds of questions – by first understanding what you really want, then computing the answer, and then giving you links to documents that related to the answer. But even if it is never applied to document retrieval, I think it has the potential to play a leading role in all our daily lives – it could function like a kind of expert assistant, with all the facts and computational power in the world at our fingertips.”
Guardian: “Whatever the outcome of Wolfram’s audacious claims, however, his track record is strong. One of his previous creations, the computer program Mathematica, is now used by many scientists to help them with their work.”
MediaPost: “I’m not questioning Google’s motives here; it’s not trying to keep us dumb or make us dumber. Yet there’s a big difference between information retrieval and computation. All of the semantic engines I’ve seen so far focus on making retrieval better, while other engines try to change around the search results page as if it needs some kind of digital feng shui. Wolfram Alpha strikes me (one of the masses who hasn’t seen it yet) as solving a new problem. If it succeeds, congratulations, Mr. Wolfram, and thanks in advance. If it doesn’t, Wolfram is paving the way for others – perhaps even Google.”
VentureBeat: “I can’t wait to use this new engine. I remember when Powerset first emerged, making claims that it could use natural language to understand your questions, and generated a lot of hype. The company didn’t live up to the hype but at least offered a valuable contribution to the search engine field. Wolfram Alpha has the feel of something somewhat more realistic, because the magnitude of its task is so clearly obvious from the beginning, and because the founder concedes from the beginning this is a work in progress.“
Gerrit Eicker 13:29 on 1. May 2009 Permalink |
TC: “Granted, this doesn’t look like any kind of Google replacement, at least for general search terms or news. And as Danny Sullivan pointed out, these could have been terms handpicked because they performed well on the engine. But I’m excited nonetheless, and look forward to trying it out for myself.”
RWW: “Alpha will come in a free version, but there will also be a paid version, which will allow users to download and upload data to Alpha. Stephen Wolfram did not go into too much detail, including pricing, but pro users will, for example, be able to not just see a graph, but also download the data behind this graph for use on their own machines or in Mathematica.” (Screenshots)