Wikipedia Citations
Does only written knowledge count? Wikipedia and the rules of citation and verification; http://eicker.at/WikipediaCitations
Does only written knowledge count? Wikipedia and the rules of citation and verification; http://eicker.at/WikipediaCitations
Rosen: Making facts public does not a public make, information alone will not inform us; http://eicker.at/Narrative
NN/g (free PDF): Design guidelines for streams sent through social networks, RSS; http://eicker.at/FeedUsability (via @mseibert)
Arrington: Any decent blogger can manipulate the hell out of their audience. Do not be manipulated; http://j.mp/aMRsvW
Carr: Switching back from micro- to blogging is as ridiculous as from IMing to letter-writing; http://j.mp/daPdxr
Writing for the Web: 20 tips from Reiss; http://j.mp/8Zws6P (via @mseibert), 20+ papers from Nielsen; http://j.mp/denaAR
Johnson: We are reading far more often, marginally less focused, exponentially more connected; http://j.mp/dpbnwk
Pew (Future IV survey, PDF): The Internet will enhance our intelligence, not make us stupid; http://j.mp/bgc0Et
You probably read this text: But what happens if it’s more than 14o characters? More than 111 words? http://is.gd/cF3
“Why Write When You Can Twitter?”, asks Liz Strauss; http://is.gd/qEs. – But isn’t tweeting extremely focused writing?
Most people can’t get by an introduction in 140 characters, let alone create a tweet that resembles something interesting. I wish some people were forced to tweet rather then ramble to some conclusion.
True. – And it’s the 14o characters restriction that brought me back to blogging.
That, and the restrictions on the number of times you can post because of system loads. Twitter can find a purpose, but blogs that help organize thoughts and make it easy to find information will always have a place in the hearts of many.
I believe that twitter will exceed its current functionality and will become more bloggish in future. Still, I didn’t want to wait for it… And for sure: ‘classical blogging’ is going to survive.
Reiss: “The truth is, most online readers don’t care much about how web writers tackle grammar, spelling, and punctuation as long as they get the information they need. That said, good grammar does build trust in your organization. Proper spelling does, too – so proofread your text and ask a professional copywriter to look it over if at all possible.”
Reiss’ 20 tips:
1. Kill your darlings
2. Apply George Orwell’s rules
3: Build shared references
4. Write front-loaded paragraphs
5. Accept that people read differently on the Web
6. Respect levels of detail
7. Don’t make things too granular
8. Define your goal
9. Minimize instructions
10. Eliminate ‘happy talk’
11. Be objective
12. Be personal
13. Be concise
14. Avoid secret language
15. Make stuff scanable, skimable, usable
16. Write communicative subheads
17. Write accurate labels
18. Go back and edit your work
19. Remember to write the ‘invisible’ text
20. Don’t let anyone talk you into increasing keyword density for SEO
Nielsen: “Research on how users read on the Web and how authors should write their Web pages.”