Google Wave: Overhyped? Cool? Collaborative?
Since Google Wave invitations are pouring in, the discussion about it has just begun; http://j.mp/23n3K9
Since Google Wave invitations are pouring in, the discussion about it has just begun; http://j.mp/23n3K9
Gerrit Eicker 14:09 on 2. October 2009 Permalink |
Scoble: “Google’s Wave will crash hard onto the beach of overhype.”
Ruble: “It is way cool. It is real time – where the world is going. But, for now, it does create more problems than it solves. Let’s see if Wave 2.0 fixes that.”
Gray: “Its nature offers an opportunity to further eliminate distance and improve information exchanges.“
Martin Seibert 00:12 on 10. October 2009 Permalink |
Ich bin auch sehr skeptisch, ob diese Applikation für die Masse der Anwender nicht zu komplex wird. Ich freue mich trotzdem drauf. :-)
Gerrit Eicker 09:08 on 10. October 2009 Permalink |
Wie bei allen anderen neuen Produktivtechnologien im Web, wird auch hier die Adaptionsrate gering sein und ihre Steigerung langsam verlaufen oder sogar auf niedrigem Niveau vollständig enden (RSS). Die Kompliziertheit ergibt sich dabei weniger aus der Technologie selbst, als aus den kulturellen Voraussetzungen. Der Berg entsteht, weil die Hügel im Vorfeld nicht abgetragen wurden und werden.
Gerrit Eicker 09:59 on 19. October 2009 Permalink |
My 1st impression of Wave: a nice tool with a great user interface. Maybe a replacement for the Google Docs’ Chat or IM in general. Not a wiki replacement (yet). Wave needs add ons, especially for exporting waves to a wiki or other docs. Right now Wave seems to be quite unstable (‘out of sync’ – but it’s not even a beta yet). – Wave an ‘eMail killer‘? Maybe in the medium/long term: Bigger organisations will not work on 3rd party servers. – I can’t see a ‘revolution‘ in Wave for communications: It’s a relevant evolution of several tools we all know and use: eMails, IMs, Wikis. – To repeat, but it’s really great: Wave will have serious impact on the UI design of several tools. I want the timeline in every doc!
Gerrit Eicker 10:54 on 19. October 2009 Permalink |
The Google Wave Federation Protocol is already available: Check out the source code and get started with the introductory documentation; http://j.mp/4okIjq (via @tailorable)
Welt Wave « Wir sprechen Online. 09:07 on 5. November 2009 Permalink |
[…] Welt Kompakt Welt Kompakt, microformat of the German newspaper Die Welt, starts a public Google Wave; http://j.mp/4dVXLg (via @heinz) […]
Google Wave Summary « Wir sprechen Online. 10:51 on 27. November 2009 Permalink |
[…] Wave Summary Our internal wave published at TechCrunch: Why Google Wave sucks, and why you will use it anyway; http://j.mp/8vRVv7 […]
12sprints « Wir sprechen Online. 09:51 on 6. February 2010 Permalink |
[…] SAP launched 12Sprints, a collaboration environment, to public beta: alternative to Google Wave; http://j.mp/12sprints […]
Google Wave: a Lost Year « Wir sprechen Online. 09:44 on 29. May 2010 Permalink |
[…] Wave: a Lost Year Google Wave turns 1 and sign-ups are open finally: Will it leave its niches in future? Probably not; http://j.mp/9CDdke […]
Wave Over « Wir sprechen Online. 07:14 on 5. August 2010 Permalink |
[…] Google: Wave has not seen the user adoption we would have liked. We do not continue developing Wave; http://j.mp/cogIlP […]
Save Google Wave « Wir sprechen Online. 15:15 on 9. August 2010 Permalink |
[…] Do you think that Google Wave should be saved? http://j.mp/bR2zsL #SaveGoogleWave @SaveGoogleWave http://j.mp/WaveOver […]
Google Wave Survives: Wave in a Box « Wir sprechen Online. 06:19 on 3. September 2010 Permalink |
[…] Wave Survives: Wave in a Box Google: We will expand upon the 200K lines of code we have already open sourced. Go Wave in a Box! http://j.mp/alMzSm […]