Wir sprechen Online.

Gerrit Eicker 06:35 on 12. August 2010 Permalink
Tags: .EN ( 3,425 ), Access ( 56 ), Ask.com ( 6 ), Broadband ( 22 ), Business ( 1,192 ), Business Models ( 71 ), Citysearch ( 7 ), Communications ( 594 ), Competition ( 65 ), Content ( 174 ), FCC ( 15 ), Google ( 648 ), Infrastructure ( 22 ), Innovation ( 99 ), InterActiveCorp, IT ( 1,958 ), Markets ( 596 ), Media ( 621 ), Mobile ( 348 ), Net ( 2,755 ), Net Neutrality ( 26 ), Nethnology ( 1,119 ), Organisation ( 420 ), Publishing ( 640 ), Quotes ( 584 ), Regulations ( 27 ), Search ( 308 ), Verizon ( 11 ), Web ( 3,322 ), Wireless ( 7 ), Wireless Carriers ( 6 )   

• 

  Gerrit Eicker 06:38 on 12. August 2010 Permalink | Reply

  NYT: “Most media companies have stayed mute on the subject, but in an interview this week, the media mogul Barry Diller called the proposal a sham. … Mr. Diller asserted that the Google-Verizon proposal ‘doesn’t preserve net neutrality, full stop, or anything like it.’ Asked if other media executives were staying quiet because they stand to gain from a less open Internet, he said simply, ‘Yes.’“

• 

  Being Half-open? « Wir sprechen Online. 07:02 on 16. August 2010 Permalink | Reply

  […] Schonfeld on Google-Verizon: Wireless is not different. You can not be half-open; http://j.mp/bGw6Ib […]

• 

  The Net Was Never Really Neutral « Wir sprechen Online. 06:46 on 9. September 2010 Permalink | Reply

  […] Net Was Never Really Neutral Shapiro: Why the net was never really neutral anyway and how both sides are missing the point; http://j.mp/dmB7ja […]