Wir sprechen Online.

Tagged: J. C. Penney Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

• 

  Gerrit Eicker 19:02 on 17. February 2011 Permalink
  Tags: .EN ( 3,425 ), Accuracy ( 3 ), Black Hat SEO ( 2 ), Business ( 1,192 ), Content ( 174 ), Context ( 27 ), Contextual Search ( 2 ), Curation ( 29 ), EdgeRank ( 10 ), Editorial Curation ( 5 ), Google ( 648 ), Google Personalized Search ( 4 ), Innovation ( 99 ), IT ( 1,958 ), J. C. Penney, JCPenney.com ( 2 ), Marketing ( 879 ), Markets ( 596 ), Net ( 2,755 ), PageRank ( 10 ), Personalisation ( 47 ), Personalised Search ( 7 ), Ranking Algorithms ( 7 ), Rankings ( 29 ), Search ( 308 ), SEO ( 42 ), SEO Spam ( 4 ), SERP ( 15 ), Social ( 185 ), Social Curation ( 13 ), Social Media ( 1,080 ), Web ( 3,322 )   

  Search vs. Curation 

  Teicher: Are search rankings an outdated system? Is there a single best answer? http://eicker.at/SearchVsCuration

  Google Updates Social Search « Wir sprechen Online. is discussing. Toggle Comments

   
• 

  Gerrit Eicker 15:53 on 15. February 2011 Permalink
  Tags: .EN ( 3,425 ), Black Hat SEO ( 2 ), Business ( 1,192 ), Google ( 648 ), Google Webspam, IT ( 1,958 ), J. C. Penney, JCPenney.com ( 2 ), Marketing ( 879 ), Net ( 2,755 ), Online Shopping ( 26 ), PageRank ( 10 ), Quotes ( 584 ), Rankings ( 29 ), Sales ( 119 ), Search ( 308 ), SEO ( 42 ), SEO Spam ( 4 ), SERP ( 15 ), Shops ( 21 ), Spam ( 18 ), Spam Filters ( 5 ), Web ( 3,322 ), Webspam   

  Black Hat SEO 

  Segal: The dirty little secrets of search. Or: the J. C. Penney case. Cutts: We take strong action; http://eicker.at/BlackHatSEO

  Search vs. Curation « Wir sprechen Online. is discussing. Toggle Comments